Insights: Publications Tough Supreme Court Stance on Patent Eligibility Challenges Software, DNA-Related Inventions
Intellectual Property Law 2015: Top Lawyers on Trends and Key Strategies for the Upcoming Year
“Tough Supreme Court Stance on Patent Eligibility Challenges Software, DNA-Related Inventions,” Chapter, Intellectual Property Law 2015: Top Lawyers on Trends and Key Strategies for the Upcoming Year, Publication of Thomson Reuters
Intellectual Property Law 2015 discusses the key upcoming trends in intellectual property law for 2015, highlighting the major milestones over the past year and providing overall thought leadership for the year ahead. Featuring partners from some of the nation's leading law firms, these experts discuss recent changes in laws, decisions, and policies that have affected the practice of intellectual property law, as well as recent case decisions that will impact the future scope of this ever-changing area of law. These authors identify the major hurdles their clients will face in 2015 and the most significant changes they are looking to employ in their strategy over the upcoming year.
Related Industries
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
